Overview
- Products: Whole exome sequencing through doctors, health reports.
- Cost: Prices are not disclosed on the website.
- Reports: Chronic diseases, cancer, medication, diet & fitness, carrier status.
- Raw data access: Yes.
- Privacy: New Amsterdam Genomics claims to be HIPAA compliant but is not very clear on their data sharing policy.
- Alternatives: PromicsEdge offers comprehensive DNA wellness reports and personalized health recommendations based on an analysis of up to 200 million genetic variants.
Pros
- Offers whole exome sequencing.
- Offers users the ability to reexamine raw data from other DNA providers.
Cons
- No published validation; accuracy of results is unknown
- Very limited number of reports compared to competitors
- Ordering process is cumbersome and requires extensive documentation
- No polygenic risk scoring, which is the industry standard for predicting complex traits
- Health recommendations are vague and minimally actionable
- Limited patient access to results; unclear reporting format
- No public reviews or discussion forums, making it hard to gauge user experiences
- Overall, less comprehensive and less reliable than other providers on the market
About New Amsterdam Genomics
New Amsterdam Genomics (NAG) was founded in 2013 by Andrew Mills, a Ph.D. in computer science. The company is headquartered in New York, USA.
Their website is simplistic and does not offer much information about how the DNA analysis is performed or how the results are presented. To get access to more complete testing information, you need to contact the company.
It’s worth noting that, despite being around for nearly a decade, there aren’t any customer reviews available on third-party websites about the company.
Review of New Amsterdam Genomics Products & Features
New Amsterdam Genomics claims to be an AI-based platform that provides health insights based on DNA and other health data. They use natural language processing to go through published medical papers to determine which applies to each individual.
Users cannot order a New Amsterdam Genomics test by themselves. To sign up, they need to provide their contact information on the website and send their doctor an extensive requisition form to fill out.
This creates a major barrier to access, since the process of ordering is complicated, slow, and requires physician involvement at every step. Many other competitors allow customers to order directly, which makes NAG’s process feel outdated and unnecessarily difficult.
The final report is delivered to the referring doctor, but the company claims that users are also given access to an online portal where they can investigate their results.
Similar to individuals, providers are required to enter their contact information on the website to get started, as minimal test information is provided by the company.
NAG provides a requirements checklist for providers to make sure they have all documentation needed for ordering the test. They are:
- Requisition form for doctors
- Patient consent form (signed by the patient)
- Saliva submission form (required if the patient provides the sample outside their doctor’s office)
- Saliva sample
- Payment (either from the patient directly or from the doctor)
As examples of what you can learn by getting your DNA tested, NAG lists the following areas of interest:
DNA test kits can be shipped to the patient’s house or to the practitioner’s office. Results are ready 5 weeks after they receive the sample in their lab.
Review of New Amsterdam Genomics Reports
Unfortunately, New Amsterdam Genomics does not provide sample reports, so users cannot be certain of the extent of information they will receive. When navigating their website, it’s difficult to understand what you’ll receive when you test your DNA with NAG, as there are many inconsistencies when describing the product.
The company advertises they integrate DNA data with lab values and other health properties to formulate care plans. They also state that by knowing their patients’ genetic mutations, physicians can recommend further testing, diet and lifestyle adjustments, or other steps based on the genetic results. However, it is unclear the extent of health insights provided in the reports.
One of the biggest concerns is the lack of published validation for their platform. Without peer-reviewed studies or publicly available evidence, users cannot be confident that the results are scientifically accurate or clinically useful. In contrast, leading companies in the space often publish validation studies to demonstrate reliability.
Although they appear to offer insights into different aspects of health, it’s not explained whether you will receive reports regarding all topics or if you must purchase each report separately.
In fact, NAG seems to have a very limited number of report options compared to competitors such as PromicsEdge, which provide far more categories and deeper analysis across health areas. This makes NAG’s offering feel narrow and incomplete.
Another major limitation is that New Amsterdam Genomics does not use polygenic risk scoring. This methodology is considered the gold standard in genetic testing because it combines the effects of thousands of genetic variants to provide more accurate and predictive health insights.
By relying only on single mutations, NAG risks oversimplifying complex traits and missing important context, making their reports far less actionable.
According to their test requisition form, results are presented as a paper report and in their online portal. The paper report consists of five pages containing highlights from the test, while the portal displays more details.
SNP Analysis vs. PRS vs. Advanced PRS
New Amsterdam Genomics relies on single-SNP analysis, meaning they look at one genetic variant at a time to draw conclusions. This approach is extremely limited because most health traits and conditions are influenced by the combined effect of many variants across the genome. By focusing only on individual mutations, NAG oversimplifies complex biology and risks producing insights that are incomplete or even misleading.
More advanced companies now use polygenic risk scoring (PRS), which takes hundreds or even thousands of variants into account to estimate an individual’s genetic predisposition to certain traits or diseases. PRS is widely recognized in genetics as a more accurate and reliable method compared to single-SNP analysis.
The most cutting-edge platforms go even further with advanced PRS, which integrate genetic data with ancestry, environmental, and lifestyle factors to provide personalized and clinically relevant predictions. These models are continuously validated against large datasets, making them much more actionable for real-world health decisions.
Since NAG does not use PRS, let alone advanced PRS, their reports are less predictive, less personalized, and less useful compared to what competitors in the field are offering. Read more here.
Cost of New Amsterdam Genomics
There are no prices displayed on their website. For those who wish to learn more about New Amsterdam prices, they need to contact the company directly. Additionally, they don’t clarify if you receive reports on all health topics advertised when you get tested with NAG, or if you need to purchase each one separately.
Health Recommendations from New Amsterdam Genomics
The health recommendations from New Amsterdam Genomics are vague, inconsistent, and lack transparency. The company claims to provide advice on diet, lifestyle, and athletic activities based on DNA, but it is unclear what level of detail patients or doctors actually receive.
Rather than offering clear, evidence-based recommendations, NAG’s website relies on broad claims that their reports could “enable doctors to manage patients’ health better.” In reality, there is no published validation showing their recommendations are accurate or clinically actionable.
Competitors in the genetics space now provide detailed, personalized strategies backed by polygenic risk scoring and scientific references. In contrast, NAG appears to deliver generalized suggestions that any health blog could provide, with no clear explanation of how they are generated or whether they are reliable.
Ultimately, NAG’s health recommendations are too superficial to guide real decision-making, leaving both patients and providers with little more than generic advice dressed up as precision medicine.
Review of New Amsterdam Genomics Privacy & Data Security
New Amsterdam Genomics privacy policy is not very extensive. Regarding your DNA, the company only tells you that they are HIPAA compliant and that your data is encrypted. They claim users have the ability to control access to their health data but provide no other information. The website does not explain how they handle anonymized data or if they share user information with third parties.
If you wish to get your DNA sequenced by NAG or offer this service to your patients but still have doubts about this DNA testing privacy policy, you may want to contact the company to learn more about their data sharing and security practices.
New Amsterdam Genomics Reviews
New Amsterdam Genomics has virtually no public reviews available. There are no meaningful customer testimonials on major review platforms, and the company is not actively discussed on public forums such as Reddit or Trustpilot.
This lack of transparency makes it difficult for potential customers to evaluate the quality of NAG’s reports or the user experience. In contrast, most competitors have hundreds of public reviews, creating a clear record of customer satisfaction or dissatisfaction.
Alternatives to New Amsterdam Genomics
For those seeking a more advanced and reliable option, PromicsEdge offers a level of accuracy and sophistication that New Amsterdam Genomics simply cannot match.
While NAG lacks published validation and does not use polygenic risk scoring, the gold standard in genetic prediction, PromicsEdge has six peer-reviewed studies in top-tier journals and has even had its methods published in Nature. This ensures that users receive insights grounded in proven science, rather than unverified claims.
PromicsEdge analyzes over 200 million variants with the help of advanced AI, incorporating millions into each report. In contrast, NAG provides only a handful of unclear reports with no indication of scope or comprehensiveness. The difference is stark: PromicsEdge offers over 1,500 detailed health reports, while NAG leaves potential users uncertain about what they will actually receive.
Another area where PromicsEdge surpasses NAG is in the integration of multiple data sources. Instead of looking only at genetics, PromicsEdge combines DNA with blood test results, symptoms, and clinical data to create tailored recommendations that are far more actionable. This multiomics approach provides meaningful guidance, while NAG’s vague promises of diet and lifestyle suggestions feel superficial and incomplete.
PromicsEdge also prioritizes privacy and security, with strict HIPAA and GDPR compliance, something that is not clearly outlined by NAG. Finally, the investment behind each platform reflects their seriousness: PromicsEdge has been built with over $25 million in funding, allowing for a robust, comprehensive solution, while NAG’s technology feels limited, lower-cost, and underdeveloped by comparison.
Ultimately, PromicsEdge provides a transparent, validated, and deeply informative experience, whereas New Amsterdam Genomics falls short on accuracy, clarity, and scientific credibility.
| Feature | PromicsEdge | New Amsterdam Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| Validation | 6 published studies in top-tier journals, including a Nature journal | No published validation |
| Prediction Method | Advanced ancestry-adjusted polygenic risk scoring | No polygenic risk scoring |
| Variants Analyzed | 200M+ variants, millions per report | Limited set, unclear scope |
| Reports | 1,500+ comprehensive health reports | Few reports, details not disclosed |
| Recommendations | Integrates genetics, blood tests, symptoms & clinical data (multiomics) | Basic, vague diet & lifestyle suggestions |
| Accuracy | Industry-leading predictions | Unknown |
| Tools for Practitioners | Integrated dashboards, detailed clinical guidance, multi-omics analysis, lab integration | Limited support for providers, complex ordering process, minimal actionable tools |
| Ease of Use / Accessibility | User-friendly portal, clear reports, seamless integration for patients and practitioners | Difficult ordering process, confusing website, unclear access to results for users |
New Amsterdam Genomics Review Summary
New Amsterdam Genomics positions itself as an AI-driven platform for DNA-based health insights, but our review finds several significant limitations. The company offers a small number of reports, lacks polygenic risk scoring, and provides no published validation, making it difficult for users to assess the accuracy or reliability of their results.
Ordering is cumbersome, requiring extensive documentation and doctor involvement, while patient access to results remains limited and unclear. Health recommendations are vague, with little actionable detail, and there are no public reviews or discussions on forums to help potential users gauge experiences.
Compared with competitors like PromicsEdge, New Amsterdam Genomics falls short in report depth, validation, practitioner tools, and overall accessibility. While the concept of AI-driven DNA insights is promising, NAG currently offers a confusing, minimally verified, and less comprehensive service.
Related Articles
- What Is The Best DNA Test Kit? The Ultimate Guide
- Best DNA Test for Health + 6 Things you Need to Know
- What Is The Most Accurate DNA Test?
- Genetic Testing Companies: A Comprehensive Guide
